Post-marxism, Black marxism and the politics of sport. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 82(7), 24-29. Why sportsmanship program fail, and what we can do about it. True competition: A guide to pursuing excellence in sport and society. Power and ideology in American sport: A critical perspective (2nd Ed.). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(1), 29-44. Overlooked but not untouched: How rudeness reduces onlookers’ performance on routine and creative tasks. Black Issues in Higher Education, 12, 20-23. Cultural difference or foul mouth: Athletic officials put the lid on trash talk. The trickster in West Africa: A study of mythic irony and sacred delight. National Collegiate Athletic Association. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), S120-S137. A review of abusive supervision research. Cool pose: The dilemmas of Black manhood in America. Sport ethics: Applications for fair play. Gender and social reproduction: Historical perspectives. The Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport with the Devos Sport Business Management Program. University of Central Florida, College of Business Administration. Lapchick, R., Bowman, D., Eichenberger, D., Ewing, S., Forbes, A., Green, A., Jackson, B., Johnson-Schmeltzer, B., Kiernan, A., Middleton, T., Miller, D., Richardson, K., & Turner, A. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 43(6), 515–530. A community of character: Toward a constructive Christian social ethic. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10(2), 5-27. Gramsci’s relevance for the study of race and ethnicity. The signifying monkey: A theory of Afro-American literary criticism. Figures in Black: Words, signs, and the “racial self.” Oxford University Press. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (C. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.įiske, J. Trash talk in sport: A descriptive and philosophical assessment of the intentionality of trash talk in sport (Publication No. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 33(3), 239-253. Talkin’ trash at Hardwick High: A case study of insult talk on a boys’ basketball team. Morgan (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Sport (pp. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 35(1), 90-96. Trash talking as irrelevant to athletic excellence: Response to summers. A conceptual model of academic success for student-athletes. McGraw-Hill Education.Ĭomeaux, E., & Harrison, C. Sport in Society: Issues & Controversies (12th Ed). McDonald (Eds.), Marxism, cultural studies and sport (pp. Sport without final guarantees: Cultural studies/Marxism/sport. Unsportsmanlike conduct: Exploiting college athletes. University of Chicago Press.īyers, W., & Hammer, C. Blues, ideology, and Afro-American literature: A venacular theory. Journal of African American Men, 2(1), 33-59. Black bodies – White control: The contested terrain of sportsmanlike conduct. After Africa: Extracts from British travel accounts and journals of the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries concerning the slaves, their manners, and customs in the British West Indies. An understanding of athlete discourse will empower diversity, equity, and inclusion officers, administrators, and coaches in producing and regulating ethical environments for athletes in American sport.Ībrahams, R. Framing trash talk as smack talk reveals the intentionality of the aggressive interactions as an ethical construct established by the athletes within the capitalistic environment of competitive sport. The proposed conceptual framework advances philosophical scholarship on the sociology and ethics of sport by creating a line of literature that explores moral communities in sport from the perspective of the athlete. An anthropological exploration of the Black vernacular tradition of trash talk, from the Middle Passage to modern American sport, supports the use of trash talk as a mechanism used to ethically vet and form relationships within moral communities of competitive sport. The power bloc established within sport enables the formation of a moral community amongst athletes within competitive sport. This paper challenges the Eurocentric interpretation of the intentionality of the use of trash talk in competitive sport.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |